Hort. Sci. (Prague), 2025, 52(2):155-161 | DOI: 10.17221/28/2024-HORTSCI

European rose chafer prevalence on cultivated highbush blueberriesOriginal Paper

Maxhun Shehaj ORCID...1, Erzen Shehaj ORCID...2, Elbasan Çekaj ORCID...2, Agrinë Naqa ORCID...1, Blerinë Krasniqi ORCID...1
1 College UBT – Higher Education Institution, Prishtina, Republic of Kosovo
2 Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, University of Prishtina, Prishtina, Republic of Kosovo

The purpose of this study was to detect the prevalence rate of European rose chafer (Cetonia aurata) on American highbush blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum). The observation was made from the beginning of flowering to the end of harvest of the blueberry cultivars ‘Duke’, ‘Legacy’, and ‘Huron’. The incidence occurs during the first harvest of the ‘Duke’ cultivar. Three rows per cultivar, with 90 plants per row, were monitored during the research. Insects were collected on 15 infested plants per row, randomly selected, and counted. This procedure was repeated every second day, 3 times a day: in the morning, at noon, and in the afternoon. The highest presence of the insect was recorded at the full ripening phase of the ‘Duke’ cultivar, with 25.5% of bushes being infested and an average of 12.7 beetles per bush counted. The damage percentage varied over the harvesting periods: 29% of the fruits were damaged in the first harvest, 13% in the second harvest, and 8% during the third harvest. While ‘Legacy’ and ‘Huron’ stood out with 5.55% and 3.33% of infected bushes, respectively, and minor fruit damage. This research proves that the European rose chafer in the area of the experiment is a harmful pest of early cultivated blueberry cultivars.

Keywords: beetles; ‘Duke’; fruit damage; harmful pest; ‘Huron’; ‘Legacy’

Received: February 12, 2024; Revised: November 6, 2024; Accepted: November 13, 2024; Prepublished online: June 16, 2025; Published: June 26, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Shehaj M, Shehaj E, Çekaj E, Naqa A, Krasniqi B. European rose chafer prevalence on cultivated highbush blueberries. Hort. Sci. (Prague). 2025;52(2):155-161. doi: 10.17221/28/2024-HORTSCI.
Download citation

References

  1. Ahrens D., Fabrizi S., ©ípek P., Lago P.K. (2013): Integrative analysis of DNA phylogeography and morphology of the European rose chafer (Cetonia aurata) to infer species taxonomy and patterns of postglacial colonisation in Europe. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 69: 83-94. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Ai S., Zhang Y., Chen Y., Zhang T., Zhong G., Yi X. (2022): Insect-microorganism interaction has implicates on insect olfactory systems. Insects, 13: 1094. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. CBI (2022): Exporting fresh fruit and vegetables to Europe. Available at https://www.cbi.eu/market-information/fresh-fruit-vegetables (accessed Oct 18, 2022).
  4. Cheng K., Peng B., Yuan F. (2020): Volatile composition of eight blueberry cultivars and their relationship with sensory attributes. Flavour and Fragrance Journal, 35: 443-453. Go to original source...
  5. Farneti B., Khomenko I., Grisenti M., Ajelli M., Betta E., Algarra A.A., Cappellin L., Aprea E., Gasperi F., Biasioli F., Giongo L. (2017): Exploring blueberry aroma complexity by chromatographic and direct-injection spectrometric techniques. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8: 617. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Forney C.F., Qiu S., Jordan M.A., McCarthy D., Fillmore S. (2022): Comparison of volatile compounds contributing to flavor of wild lowbush (Vaccinium augustifolium) and cultivated highbush (Vaccinium corymbosum) blueberry fruit using gas chromatography-olfactometry. Foods, 11: 2516. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Fremlin M. (2018): The rose chafer Cetonia aurata L. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) in Essex: Distribution and some aspects of its ecology. Essex Naturalist, 35: 167-178.
  8. Fremlin M. (2020): Post-eclosion behavior in the rose chafer Cetonia aurata (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae). Entomologische Berichten, 80: 220-225.
  9. Kalt W., Cassidy A., Howard L.R., Krikorian R., Stull A.J., Tremblay F., Zamora-Ros R. (2020): Recent research on the health benefits of blueberries and their anthocyanins. Advances in Nutrition, 11: 224-236. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Kulkarni N.S. (2018): Pests of grapes. In: Omkar (ed.): Pests and Their Management. Singapore, Springer. 517-557. Go to original source...
  11. Lohonyai Z., Vuts J., Fail J., Tóth M., Imrei Z. (2018): Field response of two cetoniin chafers (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) to floral compounds in ternary and binary combinations. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica, 53: 259-269. Go to original source...
  12. Neto J.E., Oliveira C.M., Vaz-de-Mello F.Z., Frizzas M.R. (2018): Diversity of Cetoniidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) in the Cerrado of Central Brazil. Entomological Science, 21: 84-92. Go to original source...
  13. Puker A., Ad'Vincula H.L., Korasaki V., Ferreira F.N.F., Orozco J. (2014): Biodiversity of Cetoniinae beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in introduced and native habitats in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Entomological Science, 17: 309-315. Go to original source...
  14. Qu S., Lamm A.J., Rumble J.N. (2017): Marketing power berries: An importance-performance analysis of blueberry. Journal of Applied Communications, 101: 1-18. Go to original source...
  15. Ruther J. (2000): The role of floral scent in the attraction of Cetonia aurata (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) to different host plants. Chemoecology, 10: 17-23.
  16. Sater H.M., Bizzio L.N., Tieman D.M., Muñoz P.D. (2020): A review of the fruit volatiles found in blueberry and other Vaccinium species. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 68: 5777-5786. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Silva S., Costa E.M., Veiga M., Morais R.M., Calhau C., Pintado M. (2020): Health promoting properties of blueberries: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 60: 181-200. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. ©ípek P., Fabrizi S., Eberle J., Ahrens D. (2016): A molecular phylogeny of rose chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) reveals a complex and concerted morphological evolution related to their flight mode. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 101: 163-175. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Skend¾iæ S., Zovko M., ®ivkoviæ I.P., Le¹iæ V., Lemiæ D. (2021): Effect of climate change on introduced and native agricultural invasive insect pests in Europe. Insects, 12: 985. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Strik B. (2014): Organic blueberry production systems - Advances in research and industry. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 1017: 257-267. Go to original source...
  21. Vahapoglu B., Erskine E., Gultekin Subasi B., Capanoglu E. (2021): Recent studies on berry bioactives and their health-promoting roles. Molecules, 27: 108. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Voigt E., Tóth M., Imrei Z. (2005): Increasing damage by Cetonia a. aurata and Potosia cuprea and possibilities for environment-sound plant protection. Agrofórum, 16: 63-64. (in Hungarian)
  23. Vondráèek D., Fuchsová A., Ahrens D., Král D., ©ípek P. (2018): Phylogeography and DNA-based species delimitation provide insight into the taxonomy of the polymorphic rose chafer Protaetia (Potosia) cuprea species complex (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) in the Western Palearctic. PLoS One, 13: e0192349. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.