Hort. Sci. (Prague), 2023, 50(1):72-89 | DOI: 10.17221/59/2021-HORTSCI

Phenotypic proximity and remoteness of seedless vine varieties depending on their ampelographic characteristicsOriginal Paper

Venelin Roychev1, Neli Keranova2
1 Department of Viticulture, Faculty of Holticulture with Viticulture, Agricultural University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
2 Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Faculty of Economics, Agricultural University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria

The degree of the phenotypic similarity and differences between 61 seedless vine varieties was studied by grouping them according to economically important phenological, agrobiological and technological indicators. A multidimensional statistical approach is applied – a cluster analysis, which provides possibilities of establishing relatively homogeneous groups (clusters), based on a set of certain indicators. As the cluster analysis does not perform any tests for the statistical significance of the results, it is combined with a factor analysis, which provides information on the reasons leading to the distribution of the individual varieties in different clusters and the merging of others into one cluster. The applied factor analysis transformed all the studied indicators into seven main components, explaining 76% of the total variance. The transformation of these traits to the corresponding number of factors and the indicators in them, which explain that the varieties belong to the separate clusters, was established. The limits of the phenotypic similarity and differences between the studied seedless vine varieties and the conditional parameters of the polymorphism with their economically significant ampelographic characteristics were determined. The presented grouping can be used for taxonomic purposes, as well as in the selection to create new seedless vine varieties. By applying targeted agro-technical measures, the desired change in the indicators of the first and second factors in the individual groups of traits can be actively influenced.

Keywords: seedless vine varieties; phenological; agrobiological; technological ampelographic indicators

Accepted: March 27, 2023; Published: March 27, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Roychev V, Keranova N. Phenotypic proximity and remoteness of seedless vine varieties depending on their ampelographic characteristics. Hort. Sci. (Prague). 2023;50(1):72-89. doi: 10.17221/59/2021-HORTSCI.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Al-Obeed R., Kassem H., Ahmed M. (2010): Effect of grapevine varietal differences on bud fertility, yield and fruit quality under arid environments and domestic wastewater irrigation. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 9: 248-255.
    2. Andraş-Sauca V., Dobrei A., Eleonora N. (2018): The influence of biostimulators and foliar fertilizers on the fertility attributes of grape varieties for table and wine. Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology, 22: 35-43.
    3. Atak A., Altindisli A., Gokce A., Öxer G. (2012): Molecular and ampelographic characterization of some grape hybrids (Vitis vinifera L.). African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7: 4596-4606. Go to original source...
    4. Baiano A., TerraconeC. (2011): Varietal differences among the phenolic profiles and antioxidant activities of seven table grape cultivars grown in the south of Italy based on chemometrics. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59: 9815-9826. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Barreales D., Malheiro R., Pereira J., Verdial J., Bento A., Casquero P., Ribeiro A. (2019): Effects of irrigation and collection period on grapevine leaf (Vitis vinifera L. var. Touriga Nacional): Evaluation of the phytochemical composition and antioxidant properties, Scientia Horticulturae, 245: 74-81. Go to original source...
    6. Boselli M., Corso C., Monaco A. (2000): Ampelographic characterization of the white grape varieties in Campania (Southern Italy) by multivariate analysis. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 528: 75-84. Go to original source...
    7. Coelho I., Cunha J., Cunha J., Carneiro L., Castro R., Eira Dias J. (2004): Ampelometric comparison of wild vine Vitis vinifera L. populations and old grapevine cultivars of the south of Portugal. Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola, Dois Portos, 19: 1-12.
    8. Correa J., Mamani M., Muñoz-Espinoza C., Laborie D., Munoz C., Pinto M., Hinrichsen P. (2014): Heritability and identification of QTLs and underlying candidate genes associated with the architecture of the grapevine cluster (Vitis vinifera L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 127: 1143-1162. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Costanaro-da-Silva D., Passaia G., Henriques A., Margis R., Pasquali G., Revers L. (2010): Identification and expression analysis of genes associated with the early berry development in the seedless grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivar Sultanine. Plant Science, 179: 510-519. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Eyduran S., Akin M., Ercisli S., Eyduran E., Maghradze D. (2015): Sugars, organic acids, and phenolic compounds of ancient grape cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) from Igdir province of Eastern Turkey. Biological Rersearch, 48: 3786. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Field A. (2013): Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. London, Mobile Study: 674.
    12. Gris E., Burin V., Brighenti E., Vieira H., Bordignon-Luiz M. (2010): Phenology and ripening of Vitis vinifera L. grape varieties in São Joaquim, southern Brazil: A new South American wine growing region. Ciencia e Investigacion Agraria, 37: 61-75. Go to original source...
    13. Hussein S., Kander H., Lateef M. (2022): Growth regulator's role on the growth and yield of grapes (Vitis vinifera L.): A review. European Journal of Research Development and Sustainability, 3: 85-88.
    14. Ibacache A., Albornoz F., Zurita-Silva A. (2016): Yield responses in Flame seedless, Thompson seedless and Red Globe table grape cultivars are differentially modified by rootstocks under semi-arid conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 204: 25-32 Go to original source...
    15. Ilnitskaya Е., Makarkina M., Tokmakov S. (2019): DNA marker identification of Rpv3 downy mildew resistance gene in seedless grape varieties. Plant Biotechnology and Breeding, 2: 15-19. Go to original source...
    16. Joshi V., Kumar V., Debnath M., Pattanashetti S., Variath M., Khadakabhavi S. (2015): Multivariate analysis of colored and white grape grown under semi-arid tropical conditions of Peninsular India. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 8: 350-365.
    17. Kaplan M., Najda A., Klimek K., Borowy A. (2019): Effect of Gibberellic acid (GA3) inflorescence application on content of bioactive compounds and antioxidant potential of grape (Vitis L.) 'Einset Seedless' berries. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 40: 1-10. Go to original source...
    18. Landau S., Everitt R. (2004): A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using SPSS. London, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press LLC: 288. Go to original source...
    19. Leão P., Cruz C., Motoike S. (2011): Genetic diversity of table grape based on morphoagronomic traits. Scientia Agricola, 68: 42-49. Go to original source...
    20. Letchov G., Roychev V., Keranova N. (2021): Metrics for studying berry growth kinetics in seedless grape cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.). OENO One, 55: 119-131. Go to original source...
    21. Roytchev V. (2007): Application of cluster analysis and principal component analysis in the development of table seeded and seedless vine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.). Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 13: 409-421.
    22. Roychev V. (2011): Yield structure and variability of quantitative traits in a cross between a seeded and seedless vine cultivar (Vitis vinifera L.). Vitis, 50: 17-19.
    23. Roychev V. (2012): Ampelography. Plovdiv, Agricultural University Academic Publishers: 576.
    24. Roychev V. (2019): Genotype-environment interactions and inheritance of quantitative traits in a hybrid combination between a seeded and a seedless vine cultivar (Vitis vinifera L.). Proceedings on Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding, 180: 99-112. Go to original source...
    25. Roychev V., Tzanova M., Keranova N., Peeva P. (2020): Antioxidant content and antioxidant activity in raisins from seedless hybrid vine varieties with coloured grape juice. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 38: 410-416. Go to original source...
    26. Zhang H., Fan X., Zhang Y., Jiang J., Liu C. (2017): Identification of favorable SNP alleles and candidate genes for seedlessness in Vitis vinifera L. using genome-wide association mapping. Euphytica, 213: 136. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content