Hort. Sci. (Prague), 2018, 45(3):164-172 | DOI: 10.17221/1/2017-HORTSCI

Heterogeneous response of two bedding plants to peat substitution by two green compostsOriginal Paper

Daniele Massa*, Domenico Prisa, Sara Lazzereschi, Sonia Cacini, Gianluca Burchi
CREA Research Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Pescia, Italy

The promotion, at local level, of resource recycling chains, with low environmental impact and costs, appears of great interest for the production of green composts to replace peat in ornamental crops. In this work, two green composts, differing for the criterion of raw material selection for composting, were tested for the cultivation of two bedding plants in comparison with 100% peat based substrate. Leaf chlorophyll (SPAD index), biometric and growth parameters, and tissue mineral composition were measured to assess growing media-plant system performances. Both growing media and plants gave heterogeneous responses depending on substrate characteristics and plant requirements and/or tolerance to abiotic stress. Plant biomass was reduced by 63% (on average) in the most sensitive species due to the high Cl concentration detected in one of the two green composts; a similar trend was observed for SPAD index. The results support the shared idea that the selection of raw material is a strategy of primary importance in the composting process to obtain high quality green compost.

Keywords: Impatiens hawkeri; Petunia × hybrida; growing media; SPAD chlorophyll; chloride toxicity

Published: September 30, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Massa D, Prisa D, Lazzereschi S, Cacini S, Burchi G. Heterogeneous response of two bedding plants to peat substitution by two green composts. Hort. Sci. (Prague). 2018;45(3):164-172. doi: 10.17221/1/2017-HORTSCI.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Barker A.V., Pilbeam D.J. (2007): Handbook of Plant Nutrition. Boca Raton, CRC/Taylor & Francis.
    2. Bre¶ W., Bandurska H., Kupska A., Niedziela J., Fr±szczak B. (2016): Responses of pelargonium (Pelargonium hortorum L.H. Bailey) to long-term salinity stress induced by treatment with different NaCl doses. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 38: 1-11. Go to original source...
    3. Cai X., Niu G., Starman T., Hall C. (2014): Response of six garden roses (Rosa × hybrida L.) to salt stress. Scientia Horticulturae, 168: 27-32. Go to original source...
    4. Chong C. (2005): Experiences with wastes and composts in nursery substrates. HortTechnology, 15: 739-747. Go to original source...
    5. Cleary J., Roulet N.T., Moore T.R. (2005): Greenhouse gas emissions from Canadian peat extraction, 1990-2000: A life-cycle analysis. Ambio, 34: 456-461. Go to original source...
    6. De Lucia B., Cristiano G., Vecchietti L., Rea E., Russo G. (2013): Nursery growing media: Agronomic and environmental quality assessment of sewage sludge-based compost. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, Article ID 565139. Go to original source...
    7. Fiasconaro M.L., Antolín M.C., Lovato M.E., Gervasio S., Martín C.A. (2015): Study of fat compost from dairy industry wastewater as a new substrate for pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) crop. Scientia Horticulturae, 193: 359-366. Go to original source...
    8. Garcia-Gomez A., Bernal M.P., Roig A. (2002): Growth of ornamental plants in two composts prepared from agroindustrial wastes. Bioresource Technology, 83: 81-87. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Grigatti M., Giorgioni M.E., Ciavatta C. (2007): Compostbased growing media: Influence on growth and nutrient use of bedding plants. Bioresource Technology, 98: 3526-3534. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Larcher F., Berruti A., Gullino P., Scariot V. (2011): Reducing peat and growth regulator input in camellia pot cultivation. Horticultural Science, 38: 35-42. Go to original source...
    11. Lazzerini G., Lucchetti S., Nicese F.P. (2014): Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from ornamental plant production: A nursery level approach. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 13: 517-525. Go to original source...
    12. Lazzerini G., Lucchetti S., Nicese F.P. (2016): Green House Gases (GHG) emissions from the ornamental plant nursery industry: A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach in a nursery district in central Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112: 4022-4030. Go to original source...
    13. Li Y., Qin J., Mattson N.S., Ao Y. (2013): Effect of potassium application on celery growth and cation uptake under different calcium and magnesium levels in substrate culture. Scientia Horticulturae, 158: 33-38. Go to original source...
    14. Loh F.C.W., Grabosky J.C., Bassuk N.L. (2002): Using the SPAD 502 meter to assess chlorophyll and nitrogen content of benjamin fig and cottonwood leaves. Horttechnology, 12: 682-686. Go to original source...
    15. Maas E.V., Hoffman G.J. (1977): Crop salt tolerance. Current assessment. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, 103: 115-134. Go to original source...
    16. Magán J.J., Gallardo M., Thompson R.B., Lorenzo P. (2008): Effects of salinity on fruit yield and quality of tomato grown in soil-less culture in greenhouses in Mediterranean climatic conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 95: 1041-1055. Go to original source...
    17. Massa D., Mattson N.S., Lieth H.J. (2009): Effects of saline root environment (NaCl) on nitrate and potassium uptake kinetics for rose plants: a Michaelis-Menten modelling approach. Plant and Soil, 318: 101-115. Go to original source...
    18. Martínez-Blanco J., Lazcano C., Christensen T.H., Muñoz P., Rieradevall J., Møller J., Antón A., Boldrin A. (2013): Compost benefits for agriculture evaluated by life cycle assessment. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 33: 721-732. Go to original source...
    19. Mininni C., Santamaria P., Abdelrahman H.M., Cocozza C., Miano T., Montesano F., Parente A. (2012): Posidoniabased compost as a peat substitute for lettuce transplant production. HortScience, 47: 1438-1444. Go to original source...
    20. Newman J.P. (2014): Container nursery production and business management manual. University of California (System). Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
    21. Raviv M. (2013): Composts in growing media: What's new and what's next? Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 982: 39-52. Go to original source...
    22. Sonneveld C., Baas R., Nijssen H.M.C., Hoog J.d. (1999): Salt tolerance of flower crops grown in soilless culture. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 22: 1033-1048. Go to original source...
    23. Sonneveld C., Voogt W. (2009): Plant Nutrition of Greenhouse Crops. New York, Springer. Go to original source...
    24. Warner D.J., Davies M., Hipps N., Osborne N., Tzilivakis J., Lewis K.A. (2010): Greenhouse gas emissions and energy use in UK-grown short-day strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch) crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, 148: 667-681. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content