Hort. Sci. (Prague), 2016, 43(2):67-75 | DOI: 10.17221/312/2014-HORTSCI

Timer versus moisture sensor-based irrigation control of soilless lettuce: Effects on yield, quality and water use efficiencyOriginal Paper

F.F. Montesano1, M.W. van Iersel2, A. Parente1
1 Institute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council, Bari, Italy
2 Department of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Athens (GA), USA

The study compares the effects of: timer ('Timer') and soil moisture sensor-controlled irrigation on soilless lettuce; two volumetric water content (Θ) thresholds for irrigation (0.30 ('Θ = 0.3') and 0.40 m3/m3 ('Θ = 0.4')). The most nutrient solution (NS) was applied in 'Timer' where the lowest water use efficiency was observed, with 17 and 42% less NS used in 'Θ = 0.4' and 'Θ = 0.3', respectively. Irrigation volumes followed the plant water needs in the sensor-controlled treatments, with little or no leaching, while 18% of leaching was recorded in 'Timer'. Plants in 'Timer' and 'Θ = 0.4' had higher fresh weights (24%) and leaf area (13%) than plants in 'Θ = 0.3'. Similar dry weight was observed among treatments but percentage of dry matter was 20% higher in 'Θ = 0.3'. Gas exchanges and leaf tissues chemical composition were similar in all treatments, but nitrate concentration was lower in the 'Θ = 0.3' plants. Precision sensor-controlled irrigation based on Θ measurements is an effective tool to increase the overall water use efficiency and to improve the quality of soilless-grown lettuce by acting on the substrate moisture level.

Keywords: Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata; greenhouse; volumetric water content; leaching; easily available water

Published: June 30, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Montesano FF, van Iersel MW, Parente A. Timer versus moisture sensor-based irrigation control of soilless lettuce: Effects on yield, quality and water use efficiency. Hort. Sci. (Prague). 2016;43(2):67-75. doi: 10.17221/312/2014-HORTSCI.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Anonymous (2000): Establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy (Water Framework Directive), 2000/60/EC, L327.
    2. Argo W. (1998): Root medium physical properties. HortTechnology, 8: 481-485. Go to original source...
    3. Altland J.E., Owen Jr J.S., Fonteno W.C. (2010): Developing moisture characteristic curves and their descriptive functions at low tensions for soilless substrates. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Science, 135: 563-567. Go to original source...
    4. Blackstock K.L., Ingram J., Burton R., Brown K.M., Slee B. (2010): Understanding and influencing behaviour change by farmers to improve water quality. Science of The Total Environment, 408: 5631-5638. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Boyer J.S. (1970): Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates in corn, soybean, and sunflower at various leaf water potentials. Plant Physiology, 46: 233-235. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Burnett S.E., van Iersel M.W. (2008): Morphology and irrigation efficiency of Gaura lindheimeri grown with capacitance sensor-controlled irrigation. HortScience, 43: 1555-1560. Go to original source...
    7. De Boodt M., Verdonck O. (1972): The physical properties of the substrates in horticulture. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 26: 37-44. Go to original source...
    8. Dukes M.D., Zotarelli L., Morgan K.T. (2010): Use of irrigation technologies for vegetable crops in Florida. HortTechnology, 20: 133-142. Go to original source...
    9. Elia A., Santamaria P., Serio F. (1996): Ammonium and nitrate influence on artichoke growth rate and uptake of inorganic ions. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 19: 1029-1044. Go to original source...
    10. Fallovo C., Rouphael Y., Rea E., Battistelli A., Colla G. (2009): Nutrient solution concentration and growing season affect yield and quality of Lactuca sativa L. var. acephala in floating raft culture. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 89: 1682-1689. Go to original source...
    11. Gulías J., Seddaiu G., Cifre J., Salis M., Ledda L. (2012): Leaf and plant water use efficiency in cocksfoot and tall fescue accessions under differing soil water availability. Crop Science, 52: 2321-2331. Go to original source...
    12. Johnson C.M., Stout P.R., Broyer T.C., Carlton A.B. (1957): Comparative chlorine requirements of different plant species. Plant and Soil, 3: 337-353. Go to original source...
    13. Jones H.G. (2007): Monitoring plant and soil water status: Established and novel methods revisited and their relevance to studies of drought tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55: 2427-2436. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Jury W.A., Vaux H. (2005): The role of science in solving the world's emerging water problems. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102: 15715-15720. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Kläring H.P. (2001): Strategies to control water and nutrient supplies to greenhouse crops. A review. Agronomie, 21: 311-321. Go to original source...
    16. Lichtenberg E., Majsztrik J., Saavoss M. (2013): Profitability of sensor-based irrigation in greenhouse and nursery crops. HortTechnology, 23: 770-774. Go to original source...
    17. Lichtenberg E., Majsztrik J., Saavoss M. (2015): Grower demand for sensor-controlled irrigation. Water Resources Research, 51: 341-358. Go to original source...
    18. Manzocco L., Foschia M., Tomasi N., Maifreni M., Dalla Costa L., Marino M., Cortella G., Cesco S. (2011): Influence of hydroponic and soil cultivation on quality and shelf life of ready-to-eat lamb's lettuce (Valerianella locusta L. Laterr). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 91: 1373-1380. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Naasz R., Michel J.C., Charpentier S. (2005): Measuring hysteretic hydraulic properties of peat and pine bark using a transient method. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69: 13-22. Go to original source...
    20. Nemali K., van Iersel M. (2006): An automated system for controlling drought stress and irrigation in potted plants. Scientia Horticulturae, 110: 292-297. Go to original source...
    21. Nemali K., van Iersel M. (2008): Physiological responses to different substrate water contents: screening for high water-use efficiency in bedding plants. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 133: 333-340. Go to original source...
    22. Nemali K.S., Montesano F., Dove S.K., van Iersel M.W. (2007): Calibration and performance of moisture sensors in soilless substrates: ECH2O and Theta probes. Scientia Horticulturae, 111: 227-334. Go to original source...
    23. Reinink K. (1993): Relationship between effects of seasonal change on nitrate and dry matter content in lettuce. Scientia Horticulturae, 53: 35-44. Go to original source...
    24. Reinink K., Blom-Zandstra M. (1989): The relation between cell size, ploidy level and nitrate concentration in lettuce. Physiologia Plantarum, 76: 575-580. Go to original source...
    25. Reinink K., Groenwold R., Bootsma A. (1987): Genotypical differences in nitrate content in Lactuca sativa L. and related species and correlation with dry matter content. Euphytica, 36: 11-18. Go to original source...
    26. Scuderi D., Restuccia C., Chisari M., Barbagallo R.N., Caggia C., Giuffrida F. (2011): Salinity of nutrient solution influences the shelf-life of fresh-cut lettuce grown in floating system. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 59: 132-137. Go to original source...
    27. Selma M.V., Luna M.C., Màrtinez-Sànchez A., Tudela J.A., Beltràn D., Baixauli C., Gil M.I. (2012): Sensory quality, bioactive constituents and microbiological quality of green and red fresh-cut lettuces (Lactuca sativa L.) are influenced by soil and soilless agricultural production systems. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 63: 16-24. Go to original source...
    28. Shock C.C., Wang F.-X. (2011): Soil water tension, a powerful measurement for productivity and stewardship. HortScience, 46: 178- 85. Go to original source...
    29. Tomás M., Medrano H., Pou A., Escalona J.M., Martorell S., Ribas-Carbó M., Flexas J. (2012): Water-use efficiency in grapevine cultivars grown under controlled conditions: effects of water stress at the leaf and whole-plant level. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 18: 164-172. Go to original source...
    30. Valenzano V., Parente A., Serio F., Santamaria P. (2008): Effect of growing systems and cultivar on yield and water use efficiency of greenhouse-grown tomato. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 83: 71-75. Go to original source...
    31. van Iersel M. W., Dove S., Kang J.G., Burnett S.E. (2010): Growth and water use of petunia as affected by substrate water content and daily light integral. HortScience, 45: 277-282. Go to original source...
    32. van Iersel M.W., Chappell M., Lea-Cox J.D. (2013): Sensors for improved irrigation management in greenhouse and nursery production. HortTechnology, 23: 735-746. Go to original source...
    33. Wallach R. (2008): Physical characteristics of soilless media. In: Raviv M., Lieth J.H. (eds): Soilless Culture: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam, Elsevier: 41-116. Go to original source...
    34. Wang Y., Zhang X., Liu X., Zhang X., Shao L., Sun H., Chen S. (2013): The effects of nitrogen supply and water regime on instantaneous WUE, time-integrated WUE and carbon isotope discrimination in winter wheat. Field Crop Research, 144: 236-244. Go to original source...
    35. Yeager T., Fare D., Gilliam C., Niemiera A., Bilderback T., Tilt K. (1997): Best management practices guide for producing container-grown plants. Southern Nurserymen's Assn., Marietta, GA.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content