Hort. Sci. (Prague), 2014, 41(1):10-18 | DOI: 10.17221/264/2013-HORTSCI
Development of fruit quality within top apple cultivars based on the consumer preference testing in last 34 yearsOriginal Paper
- Research and Breeding Institute of Pomology Holovousy Ltd., Holovousy, Czech Republic
Results of all public consumer preference testing sessions included in this study were to be divided into 3 time periods. During the oldest period (1979-1990), with regard to overall qualities and appearance of fruits, the cv. Rubín was the most preferred. Next, it was followed by the cvs Fantazie, McIntosh, Gloster, and Melrose. In the subsequent period (1991-2001), the cv. Bohemia was in the first position in all respects including taste and fruit appearance. Following it in downward sequence were the cvs Rubín, King Jonagold, Jonagold, McIntosh and Melrose. In the latest period (2002-2013), again both in the total scoring and fruit appearance, Bohemia was the most preferred. It was followed in descending order by cvs Orion, Meteor, Jomured, HL 623 and Gold Bohemia. Considering fruit taste alone, however, the most preferred cultivar was Orion. According to the overall results of studies from thirty-three years, in which a total of 198 cultivars or genotypes were included, the most preferred was cv. Bohemia, followed by cvs Meteor, Rubín, HL 623, Andera, Gold Bohemia, King Jonagold and Jomured. Regarding fruit taste itself, the top cv. Bohemia was directly followed by cv. Gold Bohemia and by the selection HL 1834.
Keywords: historic development; overall values; total scores; fruit appearance; cultivar assessing
Published: March 31, 2014 Show citation
References
- Blanke M.M., Dixon G.R., 2009. The structure of coloured hail nets affects light transmission, light spectrum, phytochrome, and photosynthesis and apple fruit colouration. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 817: 177-184.
Go to original source...
- Blažek J., Paprštein F., 2012. Výsledky organoleptického hodnocení skladovatelných jablek konaného v Holovousích. [Results from sensory evaluation of storable apples held at Holovousy.] Zahradnictví, 11: 14-15.
- Blažek J., Paprštein F., 2010. Výsledky organoleptického hodnocení skladovaných jablek. [Results from sensory evaluation of storable apples.] Zahradnictví, 9: 12-13.
- Brown S.K., Maloney K.E., 2009. Making sense of new apple varieties, trademarks and clubs: Current status. New York Fruit Quarterly, 17: 9-12.
- Eigenmann C., Kellerhals M., 2007. Welche Apfel wollen die Konsumentinnen und Konsumenten? Agrarforschung, 14: 6-9.
- Funke K., Blanke M., 2011. Mikroklima-, Färb- und Geschmacksverbesserung durch Licht reflektierende Folie zu verschiedenen Auslegeterminen bei Elstar- und Jonagold Äpfeln unter schwarzem und weißem Hagelnetz. ErwerbsObstbau, 53: 1-10.
Go to original source...
- Goddrie P.D., 1982. Kleur en smaak van Jonagold. Fruitteelt, 72: 1314-1316.
- Harker F.R., Gunson R.A., Jaeger S.R., 2003. The case for fruit quality: An interpretive review of consumer attitudes, and preferences for apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 28: 333-347.
Go to original source...
- Heintz C.M., Kader A.A., 1983. Procedures for the sensory evaluation of horticultural crops. HortScience, 18: 18-22.
Go to original source...
- Kellerhals M., Gantner S., Krebs C., 2004. Neue Apfelsorten auf dem Prüfstand. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Obst- und Weinbau, 12: 8-11.
- McCluskey J.J., Mittelhammer R.C., Marin A.B., Wright K.S., 2007. Effect of quality characteristics on consumers' willingness to pay for Gala apples. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55: 217-231.
Go to original source...
- Meheriuk M., Lau O.L., 1979. The relationship of mineral content to quality on Golden Delicious apples. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 52: 525-526.
Go to original source...
- Milosevic N., Milosevic T., Glisic I., 2009. Productive and organoleptic traits of recent apple cultivars. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 825: 565-570.
Go to original source...
- Nesrsta D., 2013. Organoleptické hodnocení jablek, jak jej ohodnotila odborná veřejnost. [Organoleptic evaluation of apples, how is it appreciated by expert public.] VinařSadař, 1: 60-61.
- Paprštein F., Blažek J., 1998. Výsledky degustace jablek 1998. [Results from apple sensory evaluation held in 1998.] Marketing ovoce, 5: 8-13.
Go to original source...
- Paprštein F., 1999. Degustace jablek v roce 1999. [Sensory evaluation of apples held in 1999.] Informace pro zahradnictví, 5: 6-7.
- Scholtens A., 1980. Smaaktoets van aooels oo te kerstveiling 1979 te Geldermalsen. [Taste experiment with apples on the Christmas auction market 1979 at Geldermalsen.] Fruitteelt, 72: 514-515.
- Stehr R., 2011. Deutsche Konsumenten beurteilen neue Apfelsorten. Obstbau, 6: 324-327.
- Stoeckli S., Mody K., Dorn S., Kellerhals M., 2011. Association between herbivore resistance and fruit quality in apple. HortScience, 46: 12-15.
Go to original source...
- Volz R.K., Harker F.R., Lang S., 2003. Firmness decline of 'Gala' apple during fruit development. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Science, 128: 797-802.
Go to original source...
- Watada A. E., Abbott J.A., Hardenburg R.E., 1980. Sensory characteristics of apple fruit. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 105: 371-375.
Go to original source...
- Yue C., Tong C., 2009. Organic or local? Investigating consumer preference for fresh produce using a choice experiment with real economic incentives. HortScience, 44: 366-371.
Go to original source...
- Yue C., Tong C., 2011. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for existing and new apple varieties: Evidence from apple testing choice experiments. Horttechnology, 21: 376-383.
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.