Hort. Sci. (Prague), 2013, 40(3):131-137 | DOI: 10.17221/179/2012-HORTSCI

Importance of population size for offspring fitness at conservation of the gene pool of cultivarsOriginal Paper

H. Urbánek, V. Benetka
Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, Průhonice, Czech Republic

Effective population size for conservation of cultivated plants was studied in Coreopsis grandiflora on populations in variants of 1, 5, 10, 30, 50 and 100 individuals. In five consecutive years these traits were studied on seeds originating from parental populations: seed number and weight per infructescence, thousand seed weight and germination. Plant height and flower size were investigated in a field trial. The influence of population size was expressed mainly in traits of early life-history stages. Inbreeding depression influenced germination already in the first year and was similar for the five years while seed weight was influenced from the second year. In the fifth year there were significant differences among variants of 30 individuals and less and variant of 50 individuals in all evaluated traits. The results document that mostly cross-pollinated cultivars of a population smaller than 50 individuals are exposed to impairment. The population of 10 individuals and less is at risk of extinction. This result will be influenced by the level of cross-pollination and degree of selection.

Keywords: inbreeding depression; cross-pollinated cultivars; Coreopsis grandiflora

Published: September 30, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Urbánek H, Benetka V. Importance of population size for offspring fitness at conservation of the gene pool of cultivars. Hort. Sci. (Prague). 2013;40(3):131-137. doi: 10.17221/179/2012-HORTSCI.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Acquaah G., 2007. Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing: 569.
    2. Byers D.L., Waller D.M., 1999. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 30: 479-513. Go to original source...
    3. Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequens. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18: 237-268. Go to original source...
    4. Charlesworth B., Charlesworth D., 1999. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genetical Research, 74: 329-340. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Crnokrak P., Roff, D.A., 1999. Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity, 83: 260-270. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Espeland E.K., Rice K.J., 2010. Ecological effects on estimates of effective population size in an annual plant. Biological Conservation, 143: 946-951. Go to original source...
    7. EVIGEZ, 2012. Czech National System of Evidence of Plant Genetic Resources. Available at http://genbank.vurv.cz/genetic/resources/asp2/default_c.htm
    8. Franklin I.R., 1980. Evolutionary change in small populations. In: Souleand M.E., Wilcox B.A. (eds), Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary Ecological Perspective. Sunderland, Sinauer Associates: 135-140.
    9. Harmon, L.J., S. Braude., 2010. Conservation of small populations: effective population size, inbreeding, and the 50/500 rule. In: Braude S., Low B.S. (eds), An Introduction to Methods and Models in Ecology and Conservation Biology. Princeton University Press: 125-138. Go to original source...
    10. Husband B.C., Schemske D., 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution, 50: 54-70. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Klank Ch., Ghazoul J., Pluess A.R., 2012. Genetic variation and plant performance in fragmented populations of globe flowers (Trollius europaeus) within agricultural landscapes. Conservation Genetics, 13: 873-884. Go to original source...
    12. Lande R.D., Schemske W., 1985. The evolution of self fertilization and inbreeding depression in plant. I. Genetic models. Evolution, 39: 24-40. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Levin D.A., 1991. The effect of inbreeding on seed survivorship in Phlox. Evolution, 45: 1047-1049. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Shaffer M.L., 1981. Minimum population sizes for species conservation. Bioscience, 31: 131-134. Go to original source...
    15. Shao J.W., Zhang X.P., Zhang Z.X., Zhu, G.P., 2008. Effects of population size on reproductive success of the endangered and endemic species Primula merrilliana. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 50: 1151-1160. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Van Treuren R., Bulsma R., Ouborg N.J., Van Delden W., 1993. The signifikance of genetic erosion in the process of extinction. IV. Inbreeding depression and heterosis effects caused by selfing and outcrossing in Scabiosa columbaria. Evolution, 47: 1669-1680. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Willi Y., Van Buskirk J., Hoffmann A.A., 2006. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 37: 433-458. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content