Hort. Sci. (Prague), 2007, 34(3):91-95 | DOI: 10.17221/1892-HORTSCI

Fruit quality changes during marketing of new plum cultivars (Prunus domestica L.)

E. Vangdal, S. Flatland, R. NORDBØ
Bioforsk Vest Ullensvang, Lofthus, Norway

Registrations of crop, fruit size and fruit flavour in the plum cultivar testing programmes in Norway indicated that Souffriau, Avalon, Reeves, Excalibur and Jubileum could be valuable cultivars in commercial plum production in Norway. Norwegian plums are aimed at the fresh fruit market; hence, shelf life of new cultivars is very important. In short-term storage experiments the cultivars were compared to the standard cultivar Victoria. No significant changes in the content of soluble solids during storage were found in the cultivars tested; however, titratable acidity decreased, and as a consequence, the soluble solids:titratable acidity ratio increased. Nevertheless, these changes did not make the fruit unacceptable to consumers. The most important quality factor limiting shelf life of the plum cultivars tested was softening. Based on postharvest changes in several quality factors and susceptibility to fungal decay, Reeves had longest shelf life, Avalon, Jubileum and Victoria medium, while Excalibur and Souffriau had rather short shelf life.

Keywords: postharvest; soluble solids content; titratable acidity; firmness; fungal decay

Published: September 30, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vangdal E, Flatland S, NORDBØ R. Fruit quality changes during marketing of new plum cultivars (Prunus domestica L.). Hort. Sci. (Prague). 2007;34(3):91-95. doi: 10.17221/1892-HORTSCI.
Download citation

References

  1. Anderson R.L., Okie D., 1997. Plums. In: Brooks and Olmo Register of Fruit and Nut Varieties. 3rd edition. ASHS Press: 584-627.
  2. BELMANS K., 1986. Op zoek naar nieuwe rassen: Castor (zoete kers) en Reine Claude Souffriau (pruim). Boer en de Tuinder, 92: 19.
  3. BØRVE J., VANGDAL E., 2007. Fungal pathogens causing fruit decay on plum (Prunus domestica L.) in Norway. Acta Horticulturae, 734: 367-369. Go to original source...
  4. GOLIAS J., 2007. Postharvest response of plum fruits (Prunus domestica L.) to low oxygen atmosphere storage. Acta Horticulturae, 734: 431-440. Go to original source...
  5. JONES R., 1989. Plum Breeding. AFRC Institute of Horticultural Research. Annual Report, 1988: 32.
  6. Planton G., 1992. Fermenté des fruits et légumes. Des nouveaux outils de mesure. Infos-CTIFL, 82: 27-28.
  7. STREIF J., 1989. Storage behaviour of plums. Acta Horticulturae, 258: 177-183. Go to original source...
  8. VANGDAL E., 1980. Threshold values of soluble solids in fruit determined for the fresh fruit market. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, 30: 445-448. Go to original source...
  9. Vangdal E., 1981. Postharvest ripening of plums. Forsking og Forsøk i Landbruket, 32: 13-20. (in Norwegian)
  10. VANGDAL E., 2000. The Plum Book. Plateforsk Grønn Forsking, 13: 18. (in Norwegian)
  11. Vangdal E., Børve J., 2002. Pre- and postharvesting Ca-treatment of plums (Prunus domestica L.). Acta Horticulturae, 577: 125-128. Go to original source...
  12. VANGDAL E., 2003. Losses during marketing of plums. Bondevennen, 34/35: 12-14. (in Norwegian)
  13. WERLEMARK G., 1995. Jubileum. In: Sortar förädlade vid Balsgård 1943-1994. Institutionen för hortikuturell växtförädling - SLU: 43.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.