Hort. Sci. (Prague), 2012, 39(3):108-115 | DOI: 10.17221/150/2011-HORTSCI

Final evaluation of nine plum cultivars grafted onto two rootstocks in a trial established in 1998 at Holovousy

J. Blažek, I. Pištěková
Research and Breeding Institute of Pomology (RBIP), Holovousy, Czech Republic

Nine plum cultivars newly introduced into production were evaluated in a replicated trial established in 1998 on two rootstocks planted in a spacing of 5 × 1.5 m. Trees were trained as spindles and evaluated regarding vigour, canopy performance, level and stability of yields, yield efficiency, fruit size, time of flowering and harvest season until 2010. Significant differences among cultivars were found but the most interesting were related to tree vigour, yield efficiency and fruit size. Dwarfing influence of Wangenheim seedling was negligible in Empress and Čačanska lepotica but mostly visible in Sanctus Hubertus. Wegierka Dabrowicka on both the rootstocks had the highest yield efficiency, exceeding 3 kg/m3 of trunk cross-section area. Yield efficiency of trees grafted on Wangenheim was generally higher than those grafted on Myrobalan but the greatest difference was evidenced on Domestic Prune (more than 25%). Suggestions in terms of trees-spacing are definitively proposed upon results of this study.

Keywords: tree characteristics; harvest time; tree vigour; yields, yield efficiency; fruit size

Published: September 30, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Blažek J, Pištěková I. Final evaluation of nine plum cultivars grafted onto two rootstocks in a trial established in 1998 at Holovousy. Hort. Sci. (Prague). 2012;39(3):108-115. doi: 10.17221/150/2011-HORTSCI.
Download citation

References

  1. Black B.L., Drost D., Lindstrom T., Reeve J., Gunnell J., Reighard G.L., 2010. A comparison of root distribution patterns among Prunus rootstocks. Journal of the American Pomological Society, 64: 52-62.
  2. Blažek J., Kneifl V., 2005. Pěstujeme slivoně (Plum Growing). Prague, Nakladatelství Brázda, Ltd.
  3. Blažek J., Pištěková I., 2006. Influence of tree training and spacing on plum production economics with three cultivars on two rootstocks. In: EUFRIN Plum and Prune Working Group Meeting, July 31-August 2, 2006. Hradec Králové, Holovousy: 95-101.
  4. Blažek J., Vávra R., Pištěková I., 2004. Orchard performance of new plum cultivars on two rootstocks in a trial at Holovousy in 1998-2003. Horticultural Science (Prague), 31: 37-43. Go to original source...
  5. Blažek J., Vávra R., Hlušičková I., 2005. Fruit evaluation of new cultivars in a trial at Holovousy in 2000-2004. Vědecké práce ovocnářské, 19: 7-22.
  6. Blažek J., Pištěková I., Vávra R., 2006. Eight years of testing the Weingenheim Prune seedling as a rootstock with 10 plum cultivars in a dense planting. In: EUFRIN Plum and Prune Working Group Meeting, July 31-August 2, 2006. Hradec Králové, Holovousy: 35-43.
  7. Botu I., Preda S., Turcu E., Achim G., Botu M., 2007. Rival - a new rootstock for plum. Acta Horticulturae, 732: 253-256. Go to original source...
  8. Gonda I., 2006. The role of pruning in the intensification of plum production. International Journal of Horticultural Science, 12: 83-86. Go to original source...
  9. Grzyb Z.S., Hartmann W., 1995. Wangenheimer Frühzwetsche als Unterlage geeignet? Obstbau, 12: 589-600.
  10. Hartmann W., 1998. New plum cultivars from Hohenheim. Acta Horticulturae, 478: 171-174. Go to original source...
  11. Hartmann W., 2007. New results from plum breeding in Hohenheim. Acta Horticulturae, 734: 187-192. Go to original source...
  12. Hrotkó K., Magyar T., Klenyán T., Simon G., 2002. Effect of rootstocks on growth and yield efficiency of plum cultivars. Acta Horticulturae, 577: 105-110. Go to original source...
  13. Kemp H., Belmans K., Verheyen J., 1994. Results of joint plum cultivar trials in Belgium and the Netherlands. Acta Horticulturae, 359: 107-109. Go to original source...
  14. Kosina J., 2004. Orchard performance of two plum cultivars on some clonal rootstocks. Horticultural Science (Prague), 31: 93-95. Go to original source...
  15. Liverani A., Giovannini D., Versari N., Sirri S., Brandi F., 2010. Japanese and European plum cultivar evaluation in the PO valley of Italy: yield and climate influence. Acta Hortirticulturae, 874: 327-336. Go to original source...
  16. Masabni J., Andersen R., Azarenko A., Brown G., Freer J., Hayden R., Hirst P., Mccluskey B., Perry R., Robinson T., Wolfe D., 2007. Performance of plum rootstocks with Stanley, Valor and Veeblue as the scion in the 1990 NC-140 multi-site plum trial. Journal of the American Pomological Society, 61: 196-207.
  17. Michels P., Kirchmann R., 2002. Zwetschen in Urteil von Verbrauchen und Handel. Obstbau, 27: 419-420.
  18. Paprštein F., Blažek J., 2003. Nové perspektivní odrůdy slivoní (New prospective cultivars of plums). Available at http://www.zahradaweb.cz/Nove-perspektivni-odrudyslivoni__s513x41747.html
  19. Rozpara E., Grzyb Z.S., 1998. Growth and yielding of some plum cultivars grafted on Wangenheim Prune seedlings. Acta Horticulturae, 478: 91-94. Go to original source...
  20. Sitarek M., Grzyb Z.S., Guzowska-Spaleniak B., Lis J., 2004. Performance of three rootstocks for plums in two different soil and climatic conditions. Acta Horticutlurae, 658: 273-277. Go to original source...
  21. Sosna I., 2010. Effect of pruning time on growth, blooming and content of chemical constituents in leaves of four early ripening plum cultivars. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 18: 151-160.
  22. Stehr R., 2003. Neues zu Unterlagen und Sorten bei Pflaumen und Zwetschen - Teil 2 Sorten. Mitteilungen OVR, 58: 159-164.
  23. Świerczynski S., Stachowiak A., 2009. The usefulness of two rootstocks for some plum cultivars. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 17: 63-71.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.