Hort. Sci. (Prague), 2005, 32(4):123-128 | DOI: 10.17221/3778-HORTSCI
Damage to peach and apricot trees in selected localities of Slovakia
- Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Zvolen, Branch of Woody Plants Biology, Nitra, Slovak Republic
In this paper we have evaluated the health condition of Prunus persica (L.) Batsch and Prunus armenia-ca L. for the occurrence of the parasitic microscopic fungus Cytospora cincta Sacc. Apricot trees in 5 localities with 10 sites and peach trees in 5 localities with 8 sites were evaluated. We identified symptoms of the disease in host plants, conditions for isolation and cultivation of the fungus and the growth rate of the mycelium hyphae on various substrates. The damage degree was evaluated in 330 trees in four localities while most trees were characterised by degree 1-3. We have derived conclusions for protective measures to prevent further spreading of the infection.
Keywords: Prunus persica; Prunus armeniaca; Cytospora cincta; health condition; plant protection
Published: December 31, 2005 Show citation
References
- BÁNHEGYI J., 1985. Kµúč na určovanie mikroskopických húb. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó: 1152.
- BRANDENBURGER W., 1985. Parasitische Pilze am Gefässplanzen in Europa. Stuttgart, Gustav Fischer Verlag: 1248.
- ČAČA Z., 1991. Zemědělská fytopatologie. Praha, SZN: 267-272.
- ČEJKA G., CIFRANIČ G., HRIČOVSKÝ I., 1982. Radíme záhradkárom. Bratislava, Príroda: 377.
- HRIČOVSKÝ I., 2000. Pomológia. Bratislava, Nezávislos»: 408.
- IEZZONI I., CHANG W.I., ADAMS J., 1990. Differences for Cytospora canker tolerance in peach. Acta Horticulturae, 254: 79-84.
Go to original source...
- JUHÁSOVÁ G., 1999. Hubové choroby gaątana jedlého (Castanea sativa Mill.). Bratislava, Veda SAV: 190.
- KYNCL F., 1980. Ovocinárstvo. Bratislava, Príroda: 434.
- MATLÁK J., 1998. 100 otázok a odpovedí z ochrany ovocných drevín a viniča: Naąa záhradka. Bratislava, Príroda: 51-58.
Go to original source...
- MILLES N.V., BIGGS A.R., 1989. Cytospora canker disease of peach: breeding for resistance. Agricultural Research in Ontario, 12 (2): 11-14.
- MILLES N.V., BIGGS A.R., SVIRCEV A.M., CHONG C., 1990. Cytospora canker resistance in peach. Germplasm evaluation and genetic improvement. Acta Horticulturae, 254: 85-90.
Go to original source...
- MOLNÁR J., 2002. Vlaňająie odumieranie čereąní. Záhradkár, 38: 60-61.
Go to original source...
- PEDRYC A, ROZSNYAI Z.D., 1991. Resistance of some cultivars of Prunus davidiana to Cytospora cincta. Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 40: 359-366.
- ROZSNYAI Z.D., HEVESI M., KLEMENT Z., VAJNA L., 1995. Dieback, caused by Cytospora. Verticillium, Cephalosporium. Acta Horticulturae, 293: 525-532.
- STANOVÁ M., 1972. Cytospórové usychanie - váľna choroba marhúµ a broskýň. Záhradník, 6: 18-19.
Go to original source...
- STANOVÁ M., 1970. Parasitic and pathogenic activity of Cytospora cincta on Prunus armeniaca L. and on Prunus persica L. Batch. Biológia, 25: 445-451.
Go to PubMed...
- SZÉCSI A., DANCES K., POPRÁDI T., 1985. Pusztuló cseresznysfák mikológiai viszgálata. Növényvédelmi, 21: 313.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- URBAN Z., 1956. Revize lignikolních druhů československých stromatických rodů čeledě Disporthaceae Höhnel a jejich význam. [Kandidátská dizertační práce.] Praha, UK, Oddělení biologické fakulty: 208-216.
- VANÍK K., HLAVÁČ P., 1999. Lesnícka fytopatológia. Zvolen, TU: 109.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.