Hort. Sci. (Prague), 2002, 29(1):1-3 | DOI: 10.17221/4462-HORTSCI

Influence of infection of a tree by Plum pox virus on further spread of the disease within a plum orchard

J. Blažek, R. Karešová
Research and Breeding Institute of Pomology, Holovousy, Czech Republic

Occurrence of plum pox disease after natural infection was continually monitored between 1993 and 2000 in an experimental planting of plum trees where cultivars and hybrid seedlings were evaluated. All trees after finding symptoms of this disease were immediately grubbed. Summarization of the results has proved that infection of a tree significantly increased the risk of infection of neighbouring trees despite the fact that all infected trees were discarded. In the case of adjoining trees nearby, those within the same row increased their hazard by approximately three times and those between rows doubled their hazard in comparison with the average rate of infection of plum trees by PPV. This fact also highlights the significance of timely grubbing of affected trees immediately after an appearance of symptoms of this viral disease.

Keywords: PPV; rate of infection; plum orchard; spread of PPV

Published: March 31, 2002  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Blažek J, Karešová R. Influence of infection of a tree by Plum pox virus on further spread of the disease within a plum orchard. Hort. Sci. (Prague). 2002;29(1):1-3. doi: 10.17221/4462-HORTSCI.
Download citation

References

  1. BLAŽEK J., KAREŠOVÁ R., 1998. Incidence of sharka in plum progenies in comparison with adult clonal material. Acta Hort., 478: 73-79. Go to original source...
  2. BLAŽEK J., KAREŠOVÁ R., MATEJSEK J., 1994. New experience with a restriction of plum pox spread in plum orchards. Acta Hort., 359: 123-130. Go to original source...
  3. BLAŽEK J., KAREŠOVÁ R., MATEJSEK J., 1995. Clonal differences in infestation of Domestic Prune by plum pox. Věd. Práce Ovocn., 14: 67-75.
  4. BLAŽEK J., KAREŠOVÁ R., MATEJSEK J., KRÁČMAR Z., 2000. Rate of contamination by plum pox virus (PPV) in two plum orchards - one with and the other without removal of infected trees. Zahradnictví - Hort. Sci. (Prague), 27: 1-6.
  5. GRZYB Z.S., 1984. Spread of the plum pox virus in the Italian Prune orchard. Fruit-Science-Reports, 11 (4): 155-158.
  6. KAREŠOVÁ R., SVOBODOVÁ L., 1997. Study of spreading the plum pox virus (PPV) in a plum orchard. Věd. Práce Ovocn., 15: 21-31.
  7. PAPRŠTEIN F., BLAŽEK J., KAREŠOVÁ R., 1994. Testing of plum germplasm to plum pox virus susceptibility. Acta Hort., 359: 145-151. Go to original source...
  8. POLÁK J., 1997. On the epidemiology of plum pox virus in the Czech Republic. Ochr. Rostl., 33 (2): 81-88.
  9. POLÁK J., 1999. Occurrence of plum pox virus in plums, myrobalans, blackthorns, apricots and peaches in South Moravia along the Austrian border. Pl. Protec. Sci., 35 (3): 93-95. Go to original source...
  10. STANLEY D., 1996. A cure for plum pox virus. Agric. Res., 44 (3): 11.
  11. ZAWADZKA B., ROZPARA E., GRZYB Z., 1998. The response of some new plum cultivars to plum pox virus (PPV). Acta Hort., 478: 81-85. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.